The tragic death of a judge who fell from a building on April 12 accentuated the issue of long-term overtime work endangering the mental and physical health of judicial officials.
Many have advocated for an increase in personnel or adjustments in case distribution to relieve the overworked judicial system, but the problem cannot be solved without evidence-based measures.
The problem with the overworked judicial system is not just that it is short-staffed, but also a systematic problem of how to allocate judicial resources appropriately.
Aside from Taiwan, many other countries are facing the same challenges.
Indicator 16.3 of the UN’s 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) promotes “the rule of law at the national and international levels, and ensures equal access to justice for all,” encouraging the globe to conduct scientific empirical investigation and thorough understanding of the actual judicial needs of the public.
For this, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development collaborated with Pathfinders and published a policy paper last year titled “Improving the monitoring of SDG 16.3.3: Towards better access to justice,” to promote an international standard for access to justice.
The Legal Australia-Wide Survey: Legal need in Australia in 2012 states that the legal problems raised by 9 percent of interviewees accounted for 65 percent of the total, highlighting the centralization of access to justice.
In addition, about one-third of Australians would encounter at least one legal issue within two years, with common disputes tied to consumerism, neighborhoods or money.
Regarding vulnerable groups who need increased access to justice, the Australian government offered administrative resources and alternative dispute resolutions (ADR) to effectively ease the burden on the judicial system.
Additionally, the Canadian Legal Problems Survey conducted in 2021 revealed the same problem.
About 50 percent of Canadians were involved in legal disputes, most of which were domestic, consumer or neighborhood disputes.
Thus, the Canadian government successfully reduced the number of judicial cases by optimizing their ADR and providing legal services in communities.
Learning from international experiences, to cope with simple and common cases in high demand, increasing personnel in the administration would be more effective than adding personnel to the judicial system.
I hope president-elect William Lai (賴清德) will fulfill his commitment to establish a standing committee on judicial reform in charge of an empirical judicial inquiry, increase the number of administrative officials and loosen the overworked judicial system to achieve sustainable development goals for the country.
Hsiao Yi-ming is resource development manager of the Judicial Reform Foundation.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from